ARTICLES:
WHAT
IF?? PAST FORMULA 1 SEASONS REVISED UNDER THE NEW POINTS SEASONS - SOME
SURPRISING RESULTS
THE
GOLDEN AGE OF THE DRM
WHAT
MAKES F FORMULA 1 DRIVER A CHAMPION?
OPEN
WHEEL RACING IN AMERICA, NASCAR AND INTERNATIONALIZATION
BEAUTY
IN RACING - THEN AND NOW
INTERSERIES
THE EARLY YEARS
THE
EUROPEAN FORMULA 5000 CHAMPIONSHIP
THE EUROPEAN 2 LITER
CHAMPIONSHIP 1970-1975
THE 3 LITER (SPORTS CAR) WORLD
CHAMPIONSHIP OF MAKES ERA - 1972/1977
BRAZILIAN AUTO RACING
EUROPEAN GT CHAMPIONSHIP -
1972/1976
AUTOMOBILISMO BRASILEIRO
LIST OF PROMINENT
DRIVERS WHO DID NOT RACE IN FORMULA 1
COMING SOON - FORMULA 2 AND FORMULA 3 STORIES
RACE WINNERS
IMSA GT
IMSA GTP
NASCAR - 60s
NASCAR - 70s
NASCAR - 80s
CAN AM
TRANSAM
USAC FORMULA INDY
GRAND PRIX DRIVERS
ACCORDING TO NATIONALITY
FORMULA 1 MANUFACTURERS
WORLD SPORTS CAR CHAMPIONSHIPS
TARGA FLORIO
MILLE MIGLIA
2007 FORMULA 1 SEASON PREVIEW
By
Carlos de Paula
December
4, 2006
Anticipating
how 2006 was going to play out was a very easy task. It was obvious that Fernando
Alonso was going to be the likely champion again and that Michael
Schumacher would be strong and retire at the end of the year. The only
surprises came from McLaren: before
the season it seemed unlikely that Raikkonen would not win at least a single
race, that Montoya would drop out mid season, of all places NASCAR bound,
and that Fernando Alonso would be hired away from Renault.
To me it
was rather obvious that MS would retire not so much for what transpired in 2006,
but rather, due to the 2005 season. Had it not been for the US Grand Prix that
was handed on a platter to Michael, MS would have been winless that season, and
he finally realized that even with the whole crew (Byrne, Brawn and Todt)
in place Ferrari was beatable. He must have considered whether it was worth
risking a limb with no true possibility of winning on speed. Yes, things did not
turn around by 2006, but the damage was done: MS realized he was subject to
weakness just like any other driver, so suddenly the magic was gone. He was
better off retiring this year, when the going was good, rather than risking
another 2005 as the swansong.
As for
2007 proper, I do believe we will have a first time champion. With
Schumacher’s retirement, and Alonso’s team change, I believe a red car will
win again. Ferrari was very strong in the second half of 2006, and I do believe Raikkonen
will settle quickly. Massa has obviously matured, is fast, but I do
believe he only stands a chance if Kimi does not at all adapt to Ferrari. All
things considered, Raikkonen is still a better and more consistent driver than
Massa, who is still prone to silly mistakes and the odd indifferent race. I
would not rule a 1-2 Ferrari by the end of the year, though. Plus, Ferrari and
Bridgestone have been successful partners in the last few years, and Ferrari is
more likely to enjoy success with the Japanese tires, as the cars have been
designed with that type of grip in mind.
Notwithstanding,
I do believe Alonso is still the most complete driver of the current crop. If he
stayed at Renault, I would rank him as the likely champion again, but not
so as a McLaren driver. At the end of the day, Alonso’s move makes sense. I
don’t believe Renault is in Formula 1 for the long term, and history backs me
up on this, but McLaren/Mercedes is indeed on the category for the long run,
whatever happens to it. However, McLaren was in an obvious state of disarray in
2006, with some lack of luck added to the brew, and the changes of both drivers
will probably have some further detrimental effect on the team. Although I am a
fan of Mika Hakkinen’s, I find that giving him tests on a McLaren has
sent terrible, unsettling signs to both race drivers, especially to novice Lewis
Hamilton. McLaren historically does not know how to deal well with racing
rookies, and curiously, the same man that threatened Michael Andretti back
in 1993 looms big in McLaren’s race seat shadows at a distant 2007: good
ole’ Mika. Formula 1 is a funny business. Alonso will win races, but I do not
believe he will challenge for the championship for long, although the team is
most likely to finish second in the teams championship, at any rate.
Renault
will definitely drop down to 3rd down the order. Fisichella is a good
driver, but has shown, time and again, that he is not able to sustain
championship challenges for any length of time and always cracks under pressure.
Plus his luck sucks as well. At best, he might win 3 races during a season, no
more than that, which is insufficient to win championships in the modern era.
Being number 1 at Renault will not change his essence. As for Heikki
Kovalainen, I do believe he will eventually be very good, but podiums are
the most I expect from him in this first year. Although Nelson Piquet Senior
seems to believe Fisi will be replaced by his son, if Giancarlo does not work
out as number 1 driver, I do believe Renault will be forced to hire a topline
driver to replace him from outside, rather than having two inexperienced drivers
on race driving staff.
The wild
card will be BMW. I rate Robert Kubica very highly, and Heidfeld
can be expected to accumulate results, although he will obviously never be world
champion. I do believe BMW will win at least one race next year, and it will
likely finish fourth in the championship.
It is
very difficult to analyze Honda. Every time you think it will do “x”,
it does exactly the opposite. Nobody expected its turn of speed in 2004, then
again, no one was ready for the performance to go down so much in 2005. Looking
at the early 2006 races, it would be reasonable to expect Button would go
winless another year, yet, Jenson sprung a nice surprise, winning a race
and scoring consistently, no less than 50 points. I do believe, though, there is
a pattern of alternating good and bad seasons, so I expect Honda to be behind
BMW next year. I don’t expect Barrichelo’s performance to improve
much as well, and I would not be surprised if a team like Renault attempts to
snatch Button away from Honda. Given Button’s prior Williams contract soap
opera, this is a good possibility.
Then
there are the Toyota engined teams. Toyota has failed to succeed in
Formula 1 for the same reason it failed at Le Mans. Toyota seems to be good as
an engine supplier, like in CART and IRL, or as a semi-works team, like in IMSA,
but as a full fledged factory team it always comes up short in circuit racing.
The reason is corporate meddling and politics in racing issues, something that
does not seem to affect the other factory supported teams, which racing
departments enjoy a great degree of independence.
I will
not be the first one to suggest this, in fact, even Eddie Jordan did it
in F1 Magazine, but the wisest thing for Toyota to do is to drop its factory
team, and shift support to Williams 100%. Williams knows how to do Formula 1,
however, it will not succeed without a topline engine effort. So this answers
two questions: I don’t expect either team to perform very well next year. Alex
Wurz is a good driver, but no top Formula 1 material, while Nico Rosberg
made an excellent impression in his first race, but that was about it. He is
fast, but no miracle worker. As for the Toyota drivers, both Jarno Trulli
and Ralf Schumacher are very good, but they are definitely not future
world champions, and no miracle workers either.
So, in
an ideal world, Toyota should join forces with Williams, which, in turn, should
hire a top driver to partner any of the four existing Williams or Toyota
drivers, thus forming a sensible team. Will it happen? I don’t think so, at
least not in the foreseeable future. The question is whether Williams will be
able to exist as a topline team for much longer, or whether it will consolidate
as a midfield runner and join the likes of Red Bull et al. The reality is that
Williams is already behaving like a midfielder, more often than not.
Talking
about midfield runners, there are great expectations about Red Bull,
given the fact that the team’s 2007 challenger will be designed by Adrian
Newey. I reckon Newey is the absolute best designer of this day, but this
will not elevate Red Bull’s status by much, solely because the team lacks a
works engine contract. Engines are still more important than chassis. No team
with secondary engine supplies has ever been a factor in modern formula 1. Period.
Sure, Benetton and Williams fought it out in 1995 using Renault engines, but
there was no Renault works team at the time. The same happened to Ford engined
Benetton and McLarens in 1993; there was no Ford works team either. Ferrari and
Renault have no good reason to give Red Bull/Toro Rosso engines as good as their
works cars, whether or not contracts may suggest the engines will be equal to
the works cars. The stakes are too high for the top exotic car manufacturer of
the world and a manufacturer that strives so hard to upgrade its image beyond
that of a maker of econoboxes. Associating their brands to a manufacturer of
energy drinks will not do the trick in either case. In the driver’s front, I
believe David Coulthard is way past his prime: I don’t sense he is able
to drive at the top anymore. Maybe that is why he is taken to speculate about
young drivers’ careers. As for Mark Webber, I believe another heartache
belies him: he will be able to score consistently, but I don’t see wins for
either of the Red Bull teams. This will be Williams and Jaguar all over again
for poor Webber. At the time of writing, the Toro Rosso drivers have not
be confirmed, but at the end of the day, it will not matter much.
Spyker
and Super Aguri
Honda will remain backmarkers, totally out of the picture, although I wish
Anthony Davidson all the best in his first proper crack at a Formula 1 season.
Spyker might be a bit more structured than Midland, but it will remain towards
the back just like Midland and the latter day Jordan team did.
-----------Tell
me how I did in October of 2007.
PARTICIPATE IN OUR
DISCUSSION GROUP CLICK HERE
GRAND PRIX CURIOSITIES
By
Carlos de Paula
Japanese
Masahiro Hasemi
goes down in history as the single GP driver with a 100%
fastest lap performance. It is true that he raced a single time, in the Japanese
Grand Prix of 1976, driving the Kojima, and some have disputed the
accuracy of this fastest lap. Notwithstanding, Kojima has a 50% fastest lap
performance, as the manufacturer only raced twice, in the Japanese Grand Prix of
1976 and 1977.
Few GP
drivers end their careers with fourth place, most closing the book with
retirements. However, three very prominent drivers did so. Juan Manuel Fangio
drove to fourth place after a very strong drive at the French Grand Prix of
1958. Forty-eight years later, the man who shattered Fangio’s 5-championship
record that at once seemed impossible to surpass, Michael Schumacher,
also ended his F-1 career driving to a superb fourth place in the 2006 Brazilian
Grand Prix. Curiously, the man Schumacher replaced as Benetton’s number 1
driver for 1992, Brazil’s Nelson Piquet, also ended his F-1 career with
a fourth place in the 1991 Australian Grand Prix.
Eery
coincidence I- Americans Phil
Hill and Mario Andretti won their single championships under similar
circumstances, wrapping up the title in Monza. As an additional coincidence,
both lost their teammates in their title winning race, Wolfgang Von Trips
in Hill’s case, Ronnie Peterson in Andretti’s. Adding to the
coincidence, neither Hill nor Andretti would ever win further Grand Prix after
winning the title, and both Von Trips and Peterson ended up runners up to their
champion teammates!
Hill and
Andretti were not alone. Quite a few other drivers never won a race after their
single championship years. Mike Hawthorn retired after 1958 and Jochen
Rindt died before actually being crowned champion in 1970. Two other drivers
did not have the benefit of such excuse: Jody Scheckter and Jacques
Villeneuve would never win again after their successful campaigns in 1979
and 1997, respectively.
A few
champions were born in different countries than their stated nationality:
American Andretti was born in Italy, Austrian Rindt was born in Germany and Finn
Keke Rosberg was born in Sweden.
The only
two drivers who managed to win their official championship GP debuts were Giuseppe
Farina, winner of the inaugural championship event in 1950 (Britain) and
another Italian, Giancarlo Baghetti, who won in France in 1961. However,
these were not both drivers’ Formula 1 debuts: Farina had been driving at the
highest level since the late 30’s, while Baghetti had already driven in two
non-official Grand prix (winning both). This was pretty much the end of
Baghetti’s success in the Grand Prix circuit, in fact he turned out to be one
of the most unsuccessful GP winners ever.
Eerie
coincidence II: October 6 was a dark day for two years running at Watkins Glen.
In 1973, Francois Cevert
was killed in practice for the US Grand Prix,
while Helmut Koinigg
was killed during the race in 1974.
The race
with the lowest number of starters was the ridiculous US Grand Prix of 2005:
six. It was only one of two races with 100% of starters finishing the race, the
other being the Dutch GP of 1961, where a more impressive 15 cars started and
finished the Grande Epreuve.
There
were two cars named ATS, with no relation whatsoever to each other: the
unsuccessful Italian operation of 1963/64, among others funded by a Bolivian tin
impresario(!!), and Gunther Schmidt’s operation, that lasted from 1978 through
1984. Schmidt also has the honor of taking another (unsuccessful) crack at GP
racing, with Rial in 1988-1989! Both ATS and Rial are wheel brands owned by
Schmidt.
Between
Von Trips’ GP wins of 1961 and Schumacher’s initial GP win in 1992, German
drivers had poor performances at the front. For a time they seemed to be getting
closer, as three German drivers managed to lead races between 1975 and 1977, in
two cases under very unusual circumstances. In the disaster prone Spanish GP of
1975, Rolf Stommelen had found himself leading the race on merit, when
the wing support of his Lola collapsed, causing Rolf to crash, and kill five
spectators. Rolf would never again lead a GP. His countryman Jochen Mass,
who led a single lap of that race, the last one, ended up declared the winner of
the half-race, winning half points for his trouble. In the German Grand Prix of
1976, though, Mass was poised to walk away with the race: he was the only driver
to start on slicks, on a drying track, and by the end of the first lap he was 30
seconds in front of the second placed car. Unfortunately, Niki Lauda had his
terrifying crash, the race was interrupted and Mass’ advantage evaporated in
the second start. He would never get to prove that he was able to win a GP on
merit. Finally, Hans Stuck led the US Grand Prix from the front row in
1977, only to crash with transmission trouble. Poor Stefan Bellof, who
many considered future world champion material, died after a few starts for down
on power (and luck) Tyrrel in 1984 and 1985.
Chris
Amon was not only
the unluckiest GP driver ever, but he also was the driver who drove the largest
variety of makes, having raced or attempted to qualify a total of 13 marques:
Lola, Lotus, Brabham, Cooper, Ferrari, March, Matra, Tecno, Tyrrel, Amon, BRM,
Ensign and Williams. He experienced
a large number of engines as well: Climax 1.5, BRM 1.5, BRM 2.0 (V8), BRM 3.0
(V12), Maserati 3.0, Ferrari 3.0, Cosworth 3.0, Matra 3.0, Tecno 3.0.
Another
prolific driver in terms of variety was Stirling Moss. He drove HWM, ERA,
Connaught, Cooper, Maserati, Mercedes Benz, Vanwall, BRM, Lotus. He also
practiced a Porsche and a Scarab, and was disqualified
when he took over the Ferguson four wheel drive car from Jack Fairman
in the British GP of 1961. Moss was by far the driver with most engine
experience: Alta 4 (2.0), Bristol 6 (2.0), Lea Francis (2.0), Maserati 2.5,
Mercedes Benz 2.5, Vanwall 2.5, Climax 4 (2.5), BRM 2.5, Climax 1.5.
Moss was
also the man who won races in the greatest number of makes: five. He won races
driving for Maserati, Mercedes Benz, Vanwall, Cooper and Lotus. A few drivers
won races in four different makes: Fangio (Mercedes, Alfa Romeo, Ferrari and
Maserati), Prost (McLaren, Renault, Ferrari, Williams), Stewart (BRM, Matra,
March, Tyrrel).
Eerie
coincidence III: Lotus lost drivers in three of the six years in which it won
the championship (Clark in 1968, Rindt in 1970 and Peterson in 1978). The last
man to win in a Lotus, Ayrton Senna (Detroit GP, 1987), died in 1994, the
same year in which the make itself disappeared from Grand Prix racing.
A large
number of French drivers won their first (or only) race at Monaco: Maurice
Trintignant, Jean Pierre
Beltoise, Patrick Depailler, Olivier Panis.
Curiously, the Frenchmen who won more often (Prost, Laffitte, Arnoux),
won their first races elsewhere.
A few
drivers scored pole position in their very first race: Farina (British GP 1950),
Mario Andretti (US GP, 1968), Carlos Reutemann (Argentina , 1972),
Jacques Villeneuve (Australia, 1997). But for one race, Andretti came
close to scoring pole in his last race as well: he was on pole at Italy, 1982,
but he also raced one final time at Las Vegas that same year. However,
it should be remembered that Andretti practiced for the 1968 Italian GP, but did
not start, as he chose to race in USAC instead.
Eerie
coincidence IV: Shadow lost two top drivers at Kyalamy, South Africa: Peter
Revson in practice for the 1974 race, Tom Pryce in the actual race,
in 1977.
John
Watson won five
races, but he made a statement when he did. He was the only man to win from
lower than a 20th starting place, when he won at Long Beach in 1983, having
started a lowly 22nd. He also won another U.S. street race, the Detroit GP,
starting 17th.
The
longest run of single championship winners was 1978 through 1980. Mario
Andretti, Jody Scheckter and Alan Jones won single championships. It
is curious to note that the 1976 and 1982 title winners were also single timers
(James Hunt and Keke Rosberg) so this era was definitely the opposite of
what we have today!
Jim
Clark was the only
driver to win a GP in a 16 cylinder car in the modern era, driving the unloved
BRM H16 engined Lotus to victory in the 1966 US Grand Prix.
A few GP
drivers were born in rather exotic locations, although holding more common
nationalities. Brit Mike Beuttler
was born in Egypt, while Frenchman Jo
Schlesser was born in Madagascar.
Many
reputable Grand Prix resources report Brazilian Fritz D’Orey died in
1961. In fact, D’Orey had a severe crash at Le Mans the previous year, was
reported dead by much of the specialized press, but he is alive and kicking to
this day!
On the
subject of Brazilian drivers, until the arrival of Emerson Fittipaldi in
1970, their appearances were far and few, but things seemed to be changing in
the early 1956 season: Brazilian drivers scored points in two races back to
back: Landi scored 1.5 points from fourth in Argentina, while Da Silva
Ramos scored 2 points from 5th in Monaco. Then, there was a long drought
until 1970!
Long
spans: Jan Lammers took a whopping ten years to go back to GP racing. He
dropped out of the GP circuit for the first time in 1982, and after enjoying a
successful career in sports cars, he tried GP racing again in 1992, without
success. It also took Mario Andretti ten years to win his single 1978 Formula 1
title, having debuted in 1968.
Eerie
coincidence V: Roger Penske lost his great friend and long time
collaborator Mark Donohue in the Austrian Grand Prix of 1975, through a
very freaky accident. In 1976, the Penske team was not only back at the
Osterreichring, but it also won the race with John Watson, only to quit
GP racing at the end of the year!
Bernie
Ecclestone
actually tried to qualify a 2.5 Connaught in two Grand Prix in 1958. He failed
both times, becoming much more successful as team owner and Formula 1 supremo.
Lotus’ Colin Chapman almost started a single GP in 1956, but
surprisingly, it was not in a Lotus: he was slated to drive a Vanwall. He did
not start the race and was supposed to start 5th!
The last
GP driver to wear an open faced helmet in a GP event was Finn Leo Kinnunen,
in 1974.
Arrows,
known as the make which run more GP races without scoring a single win, almost
won its second Grand Prix! Riccardo Patrese qualified 7th and had worked
his way up to the front in the debuting team’s FA1 design.
Jean
Pierre Jabouille
apparently knew how to win GPs better than just plainly scoring points. He won
two Grand Prix, including the first ever by a turbo-engined GP car, and scored
only one additional time, a 4th place, out of 49 starts!
The Rob
Walker team was by far the most successful privateer team, having won seven
races with Stirling Moss, one race with Maurice Trintignant and
one race with Jo Siffert. One of Ferrari’s 1961 wins (Baghetti)
were achieved by a FISA entered car, but it was really a works entry.
Additionally, Jackie Stewart won the 1970 Spanish Grand Prix driving a
non-factory March. Nominally at least, Emerson Fittipaldi did not win the
1972 World Championship in Monza driving a factory Lotus: the car was entered
under the name World Wide Racing. The Italian judiciary was still looking into
Rindt’s 1970 death, and Colin Chapman was advised to enter the team under a
different name, just in case, lest the judiciary impound his equipment. But it
was still the Lotus works!
In 2006,
the national level championship that by far boasts the largest number of former
formula 1 drivers is the Brazilian Stock Cars championship, six. The following
ex GP drivers are racing in the championship: Chico Serra, Ingo Hoffmann,
Christian Fittipaldi, Tarso Marques, Raul Boesel and Luciano Burti.
Lola,
the top racing car manufacturer, was involved in Formula 1 as a chassis
suppliers, several times from the early 60s until the 90’s. When it did decide
to enter the championship as a works team, in 1998, with plans for a proprietary
engine, no less, the company almost folded, the effort lasting a single race.
The entry was to be funded by a novel, yet rather naïve, sponsorship scheme
through Mastercard. Lola initially provided chassis to teams such as Bowmaker
and Reg Parnell, in the first years of the 1.5 liter formula. Next, it was
involved with Honda, in 1967/1968,
and then the manufacturer quit F-1. In 1974 and 1975, Lola provided chassis for
Graham Hill’s team. It would also provide chassis for the short lived
Beatrice/Force team, in 1985/1986, settling the longest with the Larrousse team
from 1987 to 1993. The marque won a single race, the 1967 Italian Grand Prix,
mostly identified in the record books as a proprietary Honda chassis, and led in
other occasions.
GRAND PRIX DRIVERS
ACCORDING TO NATIONALITY